Homelessness in the U.S.

I just read an interesting report by the Western Regional Advocacy Project (WRAP) about the real causes of homelessness in the United States. The main findings of the report, called Without Housing, are:

  • The number of homeless people in the US roughly tripled during the 1980s. Currently, about 3 million people experience homelessness each year, roughly 40% of whom are children.
  • The social reasons people normally cite as the causes of homelessness (such as mental illness, drug and alcohol problems, etc.) have not changed dramatically since the 1970s.
  • Direct subsidies from the US government that help low-income people pay their rent, as well as direct subsidies that build housing intended for low-income occupants, have fallen sharply since the late 1970s, and in particular, were cut drastically in the Reagan administration of the early 1980s.
  • On the other hand, the tax deduction we have for payment of mortgage interest, which is basically a housing subsidy for the middle and upper classes, has increased dramatically in the same time period. As of 2005, the budget for this tax deduction is roughly four times the budget for low-income housing subsidies.
  • There has also been a loss of existing public subsidized housing, and privately-owned low-cost rental units have also declined in numbers.
  • Considering all of this, the report concludes that the real reason for the sharp rise in homelessness since the early 1980s is not the slight (if any) increase in social problems, but the sharp decrease in affordable housing. The social problems that lead individuals to need lower-priced housing definitely exist. However, in the 1970s, these people did not end up homeless because they could find affordable or subsidized housing. They cannot now, so if we actually want to end homelessness in the United States, we need to have more affordable housing or housing subsidies available. Working on mental health and drug rehabilitation is probably a fine idea, but it is unlikely to end homelessness by itself.
  • Some methods for increasing the amount of affordable housing (which could be offset by lowering the housing subsidy for middle- and upper-income homeowners):
    • Raise the minimum wage, so that people with jobs can afford to pay more for existing housing.
    • Offer more rent assistance to people who cannot afford to pay for existing housing.
    • Offer more assistance with other expenses (health care, child care, food, clothing), so that more money is left over for housing expenses.
    • Create more housing with lower rent, either publicly-owned or privately-owned housing.

Here are a few other thoughts, based mostly on 2005 reports from the U.S. Census Bureau:

  • The current federal minimum wage is $5.15 per hour. This translates to an annual income of $10,712 for someone who works 52 weeks at 40 hours per week, which puts that person at about the official federal poverty level for a single adult, and well below the poverty level if that person is the sole earner for a larger family.
  • 12.6% of people in the U.S. are currently living in poverty.
  • The poorest 20% of U.S. households (i.e. about 23 million households) earn less than $19,000 per year.
  • Housing is considered "affordable" by experts if it costs less than about 30% of a household's income (the National Association of Realtors says 25%, Fannie Mae and the National Association of Home Builders say 28%, and the MIT Center for Real Estate says 30%, for instance). Using the 30% figure, a household with $19,000 per year in income can afford up to $475 per month in housing costs.
  • The census bureau reports that there are only about 8.2 million rental units (occupied or vacant) that cost $475 per month or less. Considering that there are 23 million households who need housing that costs approximately this much, this simple estimate says that only about 36% of the poorest households in the U.S. are likely to find rental housing they can afford. Perhaps some of them can purchase housing, but it seems likely that most will be renting... No wonder we have a problem.
Tags:

Comments

Great thoughts Darrin, thanks! You're definitely right that people need full-time steady work in order to ensure housing security. I based those calculations on the best case for a minimum-wage worker, in order to demonstrate that even in that best case scenario, the minimum wage worker is earning a very small salary. But I think that the more relevant number for figuring out if housing is affordable is total household income, not some theoretical calculation of how much a minimum wage worker could earn. The question of state-to-state minimum wage and housing is difficult to answer. I think that the census bureau has some figures, but I don't think that they are in as much detail as their national figures, which allowed comparing the 20th percentile household income to the quantity of affordable housing available at that income, on a national basis. I don't think they have the same level of detail available state by state, but I might look into it. --Jennifer

This is an interesting topic. We have an influx of homeless folks every winter in northern Florida and the town facilities of Gainesville becomes overwhelmed at times. Many of these people are downtown where the Gainesville is trying to maintain a number of community activities, but panhandlers become a serious problem. In addition, folks just trying to spend the night in the woods, etc. are harassed. The prevailing opinion of many is that these folks have brought it on themselves, not much mention of the systemic problems that are the root of much of the problem.

Thanks for the write-up. Would you mind if we used a couple of your bullet points in our upcoming training material? It's helpful to get a perspective other than our own, after having spent over a year putting the thing together.

Yes, you at WRAP can feel free to use a few bullet points in your training material. Great report, by the way! And thanks for respecting copyright and asking rather than just using what I wrote -- not everyone does. --Jennifer

I have had your post in my mind for a while. Yesterday I noticed a news article on the Seattle Times website about a King County report on affordable housing, which is located here: http://www.metrokc.gov/budget/benchmrk/bench06/AffHsg/aff_housing.htm. I think this report supports much of what you said about the limited availability of affordable housing. It's good to know that at least the problem is being looked at in King County.

Los cambios de la ley de seguro del nuevo dueño de una casa de la Florida no están trabajando. La nueva ley fue aprobada el mes pasado, pero hasta ahora no ha habido muestras de ningunas reducciones de tarifa, es decir, a menos que tengas seguro de los ciudadanos. Y la gente que tiene eso, está pagando tales altos premios, que una reducción measly del 20% se parecerá como nada. Qué sucedió a las compañías grandes que los fabricantes de la ley han demandado se volverá a la Florida?. He llamado mi agente varias veces y nada está sucediendo hasta ahora. Como cuestión un hecho, me dijeron que todavía se estén levantando las tarifas. Necesitamos un seguro más barato de los dueños de una casa, o por lo menos la opción asegurar nuestras casas para menos dinero. Por ejemplo soy dispuesto a aceptar los primeros $50.000 de seguro y cualquier cosa que excede esa cantidad, que mí pagaría ella mismo. Tan si un huracán golpea mi azotea y suelta algunos azulejos, los substituiría aunque que el color no empareja exactamente. Una razón por la que es el seguro de los dueños de una casa de la Florida así que costoso es que tan mucha gente está consiguiendo su azotea entera substituida solamente porque muchos ajustador de seguro dicen a dueños de una casa que si no pueden encontrar los mismos azulejos o ripias de la azotea del color, de que que pueden utilizar que como excusa para conseguir una azotea nueva entera. Esta es la razón por la cual un huracán más pequeño como Wilma ha hecho demandas de seguro ser casi tan altas como estaba después de huracán Andrew. El huracán Andrew era una tormenta mucho más fuerte. Las azoteas necesitaron entonces ser substituidas detrás, porque realmente fueron dañadas. ¡Vergüenza en cualquiera que hace la paga de la compañía de seguros para una azotea nueva entera! Si sueltas solamente algunos azulejos, debes fijar tu azotea. Si de otra manera, después eres ladrón. Y el aught de la compañía de seguros para forzar a esa gente ir con los ciudadanos, porque los ladrones pertenecen con los ladrones. Contribución territorial de la Florida demasiado arriba 15 de febrero de 2007 En la edición de hoy del sol Sentinal, hay un artículo acerca de cómo contribuciones territoriales más altas en la Florida están lastimando el mercado de propiedades inmobiliarias. Sé que esto es verdad, porque ha afectado a mucha gente a que conozco, incluyendo me. Es probablemente la combinación de altos impuestos y el seguro, ese hace poseyendo un hogar casi unaffordable. Sé que esto también está afectando un cierto negocio, que puede conducirlos a moverse a otros estados, donde están más baratos los impuestos y el seguro. Tan si sucede eso, después nosotros soltará aún más trabajos. Esto tiene que ser parada. Escribí recientemente varios postes sobre esto. Una de mis sugerencias es que la Florida debe hechar una ojeada cómo las cosas se funcionan en algunos otros estados que también tengan un mercado de propiedades inmobiliarias que crece. También dije que pienso que debemos tener una imposición fiscal más alta de ventas y utilizar esto para bajar la tarifa de la contribución territorial. Esto forzará a turistas así como los extranjeros ilegales, que no poseen hogares para ayudarnos a pagar nuestro gobierno. Apenas porque somos bastante elegantes a propio un hogar, no significa que debemos ser los únicos para pagar impuestos más altos.

This really helped me on my project!! Thanks a bunch!!

Ta (for the permission and the kudos). Respecting rights is kinda what we're about at WRAP. :-) If you want a hard copy of the report or one of the posters (all printed at a worker-owned cooperative union shop), email me an address to send it to.

I found the report by WRAP and your comments very interesting. You commented that the availability of affordable housing would increase for low income families if the federal minimum wage is increased from its present rate of $5.15/hour. I agree with that sentiment. But, would it be safe to say families earning a minimum wage would still face significant obstacles to affordable housing since a lot of mimimum wage earners do not work 40 hours a week? Which illustrates another obstacle for low income families: steady, full-time work. Also, how does the condition of homelessness and lack of affordable housing compare throughout the nation from state to state, relative to a particular state's minimum wage rate? Because if it is to be argued that raising the minimum wage will allow low income families access to more affordable housing, then those states with minimum wages higher than the federal wage should have more low income families residing in affordable housing than those states with a minimum wage set at the federal level. For example, the state of Washington has a minimum wage of $7.63. Is the homeless rate in Washington less than those states with a minimum wage set at or near the federal level? Or is the issue more complicated than that?

En el sur de Florida cada dia son mas las personas que estan abandonando sus hogares. Esto producto en primer lugar de la situacion economica que vive el pais, segundo debido a que el Sur de Florida es una area con gran cantidad de personal no calificado y por consiguiente personas que no pueden aspirar a ganar mucho dinero. En esta area, el numero de personas sin hogar esta aumentando dia a dia.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
zero plus equals nine
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".